{"id":859,"date":"2025-08-27T09:48:28","date_gmt":"2025-08-27T06:48:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/galaxy-s25-vs-galaxy-s24-2\/"},"modified":"2025-08-27T09:48:28","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T06:48:28","slug":"galaxy-s25-vs-galaxy-s24-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/galaxy-s25-vs-galaxy-s24-2\/","title":{"rendered":"galaxy s25+ vs galaxy s24+"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Recommendation Score<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>95 Points<\/td>\n<td>85 Points<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>General Features<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Dimensions (mm)<\/td>\n<td>158.3 x 75.7 x 7.5<\/td>\n<td>158.4 x 75.8 x 7.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Weight (g)<\/td>\n<td>200<\/td>\n<td>196<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Processor<\/td>\n<td>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, 8 cores, up to 4.2 GHz<\/td>\n<td>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 8 cores, up to 3.39 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Storage Options<\/td>\n<td>256 GB \/ 512 GB, 12 GB RAM<\/td>\n<td>256 GB \/ 512 GB, 12 GB RAM<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Performance<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>CPU Performance<\/td>\n<td>Optimized with high-performance cores, Geekbench single-core score approximately 2200, multi-core 7000+<\/td>\n<td>Powerful but previous generation, Geekbench single-core score approximately 2100, multi-core 6500+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>GPU<\/td>\n<td>Adreno 830, high gaming performance with ray tracing support<\/td>\n<td>Adreno 750, good gaming performance but less advanced ray tracing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>92\/100 (new generation processor advantage)<\/td>\n<td>82\/100 (old generation but still effective)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Screen Quality<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Screen Size and Resolution<\/td>\n<td>6.7 inches, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120 x 1440 pixels, 120 Hz refresh rate<\/td>\n<td>6.7 inches, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120 x 1440 pixels, 120 Hz refresh rate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pixel Density<\/td>\n<td>515 PPI, higher brightness level (up to 2600 nits)<\/td>\n<td>510 PPI, brightness up to 2600 nits<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>96\/100 (improved color accuracy and brightness)<\/td>\n<td>90\/100 (high quality but slightly lacking improvements compared to S25+)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Camera<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Rear Camera<\/td>\n<td>50 MP wide-angle (f\/1.8, OIS), 12 MP ultra-wide (f\/2.2), 10 MP telephoto (f\/2.4, 3x optical zoom)<\/td>\n<td>50 MP wide-angle (f\/1.8, OIS), 12 MP ultra-wide (f\/2.2), 10 MP telephoto (f\/2.4, 3x optical zoom)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Front Camera<\/td>\n<td>12 MP, f\/2.2, 4K video support<\/td>\n<td>12 MP, f\/2.2, 4K video support<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>94\/100 (better low-light performance and AI enhancements)<\/td>\n<td>88\/100 (strong camera system but with less difference compared to S25+&#8217;s updates)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Battery and Charging<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Battery Capacity<\/td>\n<td>4900 mAh, fast charging 45W, wireless charging 15W<\/td>\n<td>4900 mAh, fast charging 45W, wireless charging 15W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Lifespan<\/td>\n<td>Approximately 10 hours video playback, extended usage with more efficient processor<\/td>\n<td>Approximately 9 hours video playback<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>97\/100 (better energy management)<\/td>\n<td>85\/100 (good but falling behind with S25+&#8217;s improvements)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Sound<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Speaker System<\/td>\n<td>Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos support, higher output volume<\/td>\n<td>Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos support<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sound Quality<\/td>\n<td>Clearer bass and treble, improved noise cancellation<\/td>\n<td>High quality but less optimized than S25+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>93\/100 (enhanced sound performance)<\/td>\n<td>80\/100 (basically good but lacking advanced features)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Connectivity<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Connectivity Options<\/td>\n<td>5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC<\/td>\n<td>5G, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Speed and Reliability<\/td>\n<td>Faster Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections, lower latency<\/td>\n<td>High speed but slightly slower compared to S25+&#8217;s new standards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>98\/100 (latest technologies)<\/td>\n<td>90\/100 (strong but some components not up to date)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"comparison-section\">\n<h3>Additional Features<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-container\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Feature<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S25+<\/th>\n<th>Samsung Galaxy S24+<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>IP Rating<\/td>\n<td>IP68 water and dust resistance<\/td>\n<td>IP68 water and dust resistance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Other<\/td>\n<td>Advanced AI features, better thermal management, extended software updates<\/td>\n<td>AI integration available but S25+&#8217;s optimizations are more advanced<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Overall Score<\/td>\n<td>94\/100 (more innovations)<\/td>\n<td>82\/100 (basic features sufficient)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>Samsung Galaxy S25+ stands out with its more advanced processor, battery efficiency, and connectivity options compared to the previous model S24+. This can offer a smoother experience in daily use, but S24+ remains a reliable option and could be a cheaper alternative.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recommendation Score Samsung Galaxy S25+ Samsung Galaxy S24+ 95 Points 85 Points General Features Feature Samsung Galaxy S25+ Samsung Galaxy S24+ Dimensions (mm) 158.3 x 75.7 x 7.5 158.4 x 75.8 x 7.6 Weight (g) 200 196 Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, 8 cores, up to 4.2 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, 8 cores, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[37,273,334],"class_list":["post-859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-karsilastir","tag-galaxy","tag-s24","tag-s25"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/859\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknofeyz.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}