General Features
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| Display Size (inches) | 6.67 | 6.7 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Battery Capacity (mAh) | 4800 | 5000 |
| RAM (GB) | 8 | 8 |
| Storage (GB) | 256 | 256 |
| Glass Protection | Not specified | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
Display and Design
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| Display Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Refresh Rate (Hz) | 120 | 120 |
| Peak Brightness (nits) | 1300 | 1000 |
Performance and Processor
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| CPU Cores | 8 (2×2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | 8 (4×2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu Benchmark Score (estimated) | Around 450,000 | Around 550,000 |
| Multitasking Efficiency | Good for everyday use and light gaming | Improved efficiency for gaming and heavy apps |
Both devices offer solid performance for mid-range users, but the Exynos 1380 in the Samsung Galaxy A26 provides a slight edge in processing power due to its higher clock speeds on the Cortex-A78 cores, making it better suited for demanding tasks like video editing or prolonged gaming sessions, while the Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 in the Vivo Y200 excels in power efficiency for battery-conscious users.
Battery and Charging
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| Battery Life (estimated hours of usage) | Up to 12 hours of video playback | Up to 14 hours of video playback |
| Charging Speed (Watts) | 44W fast charging | 25W fast charging |
| Wireless Charging | Not supported | Not supported |
The larger 5000 mAh battery in the Samsung Galaxy A26 contributes to longer endurance compared to the 4800 mAh in the Vivo Y200, which might appeal to users with heavy daily usage; however, the faster 44W charging on the Vivo Y200 allows for quicker top-ups, making it more convenient for on-the-go scenarios.
Camera System
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| Rear Camera Setup | 64 MP main + 2 MP depth + 2 MP macro | 50 MP main + 8 MP ultrawide + 2 MP macro |
| Front Camera (MP) | 16 | 13 |
| Video Recording | 4K at 30fps | 4K at 30fps |
| stabilization | Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) | Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on main camera |
The Samsung Galaxy A26’s inclusion of an ultrawide lens and OIS on the main camera provides better versatility for wide-angle shots and reduced blur in videos, whereas the Vivo Y200’s higher resolution main sensor could deliver more detailed images in well-lit conditions, making it a strong choice for portrait and macro photography enthusiasts.
Connectivity and Other Features
| Feature | Vivo Y200 | Samsung Galaxy A26 |
|---|
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Under-display |
With Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, the Samsung Galaxy A26 offers improved connectivity speeds and lower latency, which is advantageous for streaming and file transfers, while the Vivo Y200’s side-mounted fingerprint sensor provides quicker access in certain use cases compared to the under-display option on the Samsung model.
Overall, both the Vivo Y200 and Samsung Galaxy A26 are positioned as mid-range options with comparable features, but the Samsung model might feel more premium due to its Gorilla Glass protection and slightly better battery life, whereas the Vivo Y200 could be seen as more affordable with faster charging capabilities. Users should weigh these technical aspects based on their priorities like camera needs or performance demands.
