General Features
| Feature | Anker Soundcore Motion 300 | Tribit StormBox Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | Estimated 240 x 100 x 110 | Estimated 210 x 85 x 85 |
| Weight (g) | Estimated 900 | Estimated 800 |
| Highest Frequency (Hz) | 20000 | 20000 |
| Presence of Passive Radiator | Yes | No |
Sound Features
| Feature | Anker Soundcore Motion 300 | Tribit StormBox Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Total Output Power (W) | Estimated 30 | Estimated 24 |
| Frequency Range (Hz) | 50 – 20000 | 60 – 20000 |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Supported Codecs | SBC, AAC | SBC, AAC |
In this comparison, it is seen that the Anker Soundcore Motion 300 offers deeper bass performance thanks to the passive radiator, which makes it advantageous for users who want more sound details. The Tribit StormBox Flow, on the other hand, can provide a more stable connection with its more up-to-date Bluetooth version.
Battery and Durability
| Feature | Anker Soundcore Motion 300 | Tribit StormBox Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity (mAh) | Estimated 6700 | Estimated 5200 |
| Playback Time (hours) | Estimated 13 | Estimated 10 |
| Waterproof Rating | IPX7 | IPX7 |
The Anker Soundcore Motion 300 offers longer usage times with its higher battery capacity, making it more suitable for outdoor activities. Both are durable in harsh conditions with their high waterproof ratings.
Overall, the Anker Soundcore Motion 300 shows more technical superiority, while the Tribit StormBox Flow offers a more compact design, making it more portable. Users may prefer the Motion 300 for sound quality priority and the StormBox Flow for lightness.