Recommendation Score
| Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| 85 Points | 90 Points |
General Features
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 154 x 130 x 178 | 115 x 115 x 180 |
| Weight (g) | 1900 | 2500 |
| Resolution | 1080p (1920 x 1080 pixels) | 1080p (1920 x 1080 pixels) |
| Brightness (ANSI lumens) | 500 | 1000 |
Performance
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Processor | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 | Customized Epson processor |
| Storage | 8 GB internal, microSD support | 16 GB internal, expandable |
| Image Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 | 60 |
| Contrast Ratio | 1000:1 | 2500000:1 |
Screen Quality
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Projection Technology | DLP | LCD |
| Color Gamut | 100% Rec.709 | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Largest Projection Size (inches) | 120 | 150 |
| Auto Focus | Yes, automatic | Yes, laser-based |
Battery and Charging
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Battery Capacity (mAh) | 15600 | No internal battery (AC power) |
| Usage Time (hours) | 2.5 | N/A (requires wall outlet) |
| Charging Speed | USB-C, fast charging | Standard AC |
Sound and Connectivity
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Sound Output (Watt) | 2 x 10 | 2 x 5 |
| Connectivity Options | Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, HDMI, USB | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, USB |
| Supported Formats | H.264, H.265, Dolby Audio | H.264, HDR10 |
Additional Features
| Feature | Anker Nebula Mars 3 | Epson EF-100 |
|---|
| Android TV Integration | Yes, built-in | No, external device may be required |
| Keystone Correction | Automatic, ±40 degrees | Automatic, ±30 degrees |
| Portability | High, with internal battery | Medium, suitable for fixed setup |
Overall, the Anker Nebula Mars 3 is more portable and ideal for daily use, while the Epson EF-100 offers a home cinema experience with higher contrast ratio and brightness. This comparison was prepared based on technical data, and although the Anker Nebula Mars 3 has a battery advantage, the Epson EF-100’s image quality may be superior.
