Autel EVO Nano+ vs Potensic Atom 2

Recommendation Score

Autel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
85 Points90 Points

General Features

FeatureAutel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
Dimensions (mm)168 x 168 x 59150 x 150 x 50
Weight (g)249249
Flight Time (minutes)Approximately 30Approximately 31
Range (km)1010
Battery Capacity (mAh)22502700

Performance

FeatureAutel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
Maximum Speed (km/h)5856
Stability System3-axis gimbal and electronic stabilization3-axis gimbal and optical stabilization
Wind Resistance (level)55
Automatic Landing/TakeoffYes, with advanced sensorsYes, GPS-supported

Camera

FeatureAutel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
Resolution (video)4K/60fps4K/30fps
Camera Sensor1/1.28 inch CMOS1/2 inch CMOS
StabilizationElectronic and mechanical (RockSteady)Optical and electronic
ISO Range100-12800100-6400

Battery and Charging

FeatureAutel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
Charging Time (hours)Approximately 1.5Approximately 2
Battery TypeLithium polymer, removableLithium polymer, removable
Charging MethodUSB-C fast chargingUSB-C standard charging

Connectivity and Additional Features

FeatureAutel EVO Nano+Potensic Atom 2
Connectivity TypeWi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0
GPS and GLONASS SupportYesYes
Additional FeaturesAI recognition, automatic tracking, 4K HDR modeAutomatic tracking, panorama mode, cheaper accessory options
App CompatibilityAndroid/iOS with advanced controlAndroid/iOS with basic control

Comparison comment: The Autel EVO Nano+ stands out with its higher performance camera and fast charging like technical advantages, but the Potensic Atom 2 attracts attention as a more accessible option with similar flight time and range. In terms of performance, although Autel’s stabilization system is more advanced, Potensic’s battery capacity may be advantageous for daily uses. Considering these features, Autel may be preferred for those wanting high-quality footage, but Potensic is more suitable for budget-oriented users.

AI-Supported Product Comparison

Preparing comparison...
(Comparison time approximately 30s)

Previous comparisons

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *